The King’s Speech

I... I... I gratefully accept

It’s ‘awards season’ apparently, and The King’s Speech is one of a number of heavily publicised films appearing in January which has been tipped for glory. Colin Firth – fast becoming a national treasure – plays the would-be king suffering from a crippling stammer, Helena Bonham Carter is his caring wife and Geoffrey Rush his unconventional speech therapist. You can guess the plot a mile off.

Tom Hooper, who previously made The Damned United, shoots his period pieces with a kind of plasticky sheen where nothing quite seems real and no image is anything more or less than pleasant. His characters here are elegantly drawn and their motivations always perfectly clear. The unobtrusive, unremarkable score holds your hand and gently guides you through emotional peaks and troughs.

There’s skilful acting from all three leads. Firth’s stammer is convincing and he is expressive enough that his attempts at speech are always compelling, the audience left sympathetic rather than exasperated. Timothy Spall does a silly turn as a caricature of Churchill. Michael Gambon has two scenes as the older King George – one where he’s angry, another where he’s dying – and is brilliant in both.

Occasionally the camera will do something interesting, such as the moment before the film’s final speech when the flashing red light which counts down to ‘on air’ is not shown directly but reflected in Firth’s terrified face. The opening sequence – the prince’s first speech, at Wembley – is also stylishly done, the echo of the PA system giving each glottal click painful extra resonance.

Mainly, though, Hooper keeps it conventional and rarely lets his directing get in the way of the story. Entirely inoffensive, witty and accomplished, this cosy armchair of a film will have you leaving the cinema feeling warm inside, with a smile on your face. It didn’t provoke, surprise, challenge, invigorate or disturb me, but then I suppose it wasn’t trying to. It was just nice.

This entry was posted in Films. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The King’s Speech

  1. Joe says:

    I saw this yesterday, safe in the knowledge that even you couldn’t pick holes in it. Turns out it’s solid, worthy Oscar fare, and everyone likes it for a reason: a good film, well made and very well acted. A cinematic warm blanket.

  2. Nicy C says:

    I feel you have missed the main purpose of the film – to take the audience on a journey, to become emotionally attached to each of it’s leading characters and engross you in their lives utterly and completely. To create character that are like-able, relatable and moving, without gimmicks. To refer to this film as nice is somewhat insulting! Not every film needs to disturb or surprise in order to rise above the realms of ‘nice’. Sometimes all a film needs to do to become a great, is to transform it’s audience to a different time and place with magical storytelling , strong performances and beautiful film-making.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s